Jump to content

Pat testing length


mattmatt

Recommended Posts

Having a testing contractor in removes the need for in house staff to do the job BUT I suspect that many contractors sub out the work to self employed (or not) people with no insurance held by the company or the worker and T&Cs so well written as to evade all issues. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did wonder if many of the PAT testing companies had a "disposable" structure, where the Ltd. company can be wound up at the first sniff of a claim against them. 

Of course, it's very hard to prove that a dangerous item didn't deteriorate after the test took place. 

I'd sometimes wondered about leaving "traps" for testers, like plugs with the fuses removed, so that they should be impossible to test properly without replacement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

I'd sometimes wondered about leaving "traps" for testers, like plugs with the fuses removed, so that they should be impossible to test properly without replacement. 

and then you start getting into the grey areas of how the regs are interpreted,does a visual inspection,which is to check for damage cover the fuse?what about opening the plug top isnt that disassemble,and good luck when the find your 600w drill   is fitted with a 13A fuse but is wired with 1.5mm hof5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Stuart91 said:

I'd sometimes wondered about leaving "traps" for testers, like plugs with the fuses removed, so that they should be impossible to test properly without replacement. 

At a previous job where PAT was contracted out I always left a trap. It would be something that would fail PAT, but not be dangerous. As per your suggestion a missing fuse in an extension lead (so should fail on continuity) was a common one.

They usually passed...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, themadhippy said:

but continuity apart from the earth aint  required,what it will fail on is the polarity test

Aside from arguments on what is required vs what is sensbile- in this specific instance, continuity testing extension leads was part of the agreed service level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I took a tour out for a theatre company a couple of years ago. Mainly rental kit, but supplemented with some stock from the company's own inventory, including some freshly-tested (by a contractor) 15A extensions. Found one that didn't work, opened up to investigate, the live conductor in the socket wasn't even connected - just floating about in space, and the screw was only hanging on in the terminal by about half a turn. The cable had a 'passed' sticker on it from a few weeks before and had been sitting on a shelf in the store in the meantime. Reported it back to the company's production office - don't think they did anything about it, I wouldn't be surprised if the same cowboy outfit still do their testing for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, themadhippy said:

and then you start getting into the grey areas of how the regs are interpreted,does a visual inspection,which is to check for damage cover the fuse?what about opening the plug top isnt that disassemble,and good luck when the find your 600w drill   is fitted with a 13A fuse but is wired with 1.5mm hof5

The formal visual inspection covers inspecting the fuse and taking the plug top apart. 
Knowing if a 13A fuse is appropriate on the drill given as an example is all part of being a competent person to carry out the test...
(all paraphrased from COPISITEE)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A 13 amp fuse would be the norm for even a small electric drill due to starting or inrush currents. 1.5mm flex is arguably larger than is needed, and almost certainly larger than that originally fitted, but not dangerous.

PAT monkeys tested AND PASSED a Tilley lamp at one of my workplaces.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
On 8/5/2023 at 11:29 AM, J Pearce said:

To go further down the rabbit hole - is a fitting setup with a plug-in ceiling rose hardwired or on a plug?

I think that that the common types are called "luminaire supporting couplers" and not plugs and sockets, therefore not subject to pat testing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.