gareth Posted October 30, 2012 Author Share Posted October 30, 2012 I hear what you're saying - but that's the only way to do it. The VIP-90s have one neutral terminal and two lives (hot and dimmed), so commoning the neutrals somewhere along the line is how it has to be. Yes, I thought of the widowmaker element - but given that everything's up in the theatre's grid, where no-one but the electricians are going to be connecting/disconnecting it, we figured that a robust method statement and the restricted access should just about cover it. Naturally, I made sure that both feeds were on the same phase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Posted October 30, 2012 Share Posted October 30, 2012 For anyone finding this topic later on, one solution to the shared Neutrals problem would be to run the non-dimmed heater supply via a 240-240 isolation transformer allowing you to safely link the 'neutral' of the secondary to the Neutral of the dimmed feed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomo Posted October 30, 2012 Share Posted October 30, 2012 These VIP-90 ballasts are what the Sensor "Fluorescent" module is for - two lives and one neutral on the same RCD. I'm also not keen on the way you've got it connected, although there aren't many alternatives given an installed dimmer system. I'd prefer fitting a two-channel distributed dimmer to the VIP-90 (or four-channel to two of them) using 'captive' cables.Then treat the whole pack as "Hot power plus DMX". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gareth Posted October 30, 2012 Author Share Posted October 30, 2012 I'm also not keen on the way you've got it connectedIt's not what I'd have chosen in a perfect world, but the risk is controlled to a level which we consider acceptable. I'd prefer fitting a two-channel distributed dimmer to the VIP-90 (or four-channel to two of them) using 'captive' cables.Then treat the whole pack as "Hot power plus DMX".It would be great to be able to do that, but we don't live in an ideal world and our available resources prohibit such an extravagant approach. We evaluated the risk and are of the opinion that the controls we have in place are adequate given our particular situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.