Jump to content

xllx

Regular Members
  • Posts

    338
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by xllx

  1. If the amount of downward tilt is the issue with your choice, how about putting a block of some sort under the back of the light so it starts off with a slight downward angle?
  2. Indeed, but two would be better than one :-)
  3. I have used one of these on a site, and they aren't too bad at all. They don't have the height flexibility of a Tallescope, and working on anything below handrail height is awkward because there are so many safety bars. Other than that, the only issue we had was getting into corners because of the outriggers, but that applies to most towers or access systems.
  4. Not ideal for stand builders/suppliers/venue staff etc
  5. I haven't managed to see this show yet, but it's on my to do list. The LD was Tim Routledge, and he often works with Neg Earth, so it wouldn't surprise me if they supplied the kit.
  6. Possibly the best description of how I feel about the subject
  7. This is a link to an online presentation by Stuart McPherson of KB Event, a large UK based event trucking company about the issues surrounding moving equipment into and around the EU post Brexit. . Stuart knows his stuff, and presents without drama or hysteria about the very practical issues that Brexit has caused. Well worth an hour of your time if you previously moved kit around Europe.
  8. Indeed, don't envy anyone trying to move crew around right now.
  9. Lots of the UK crewing agencies will have EU citizens on their books, almost certainly could send appropriate crew if asked. Obviously it would be a lot cheaper to find local crew locally but it might be an option.
  10. Thanks for clarifying it, there seem to have been two very distinct lanterns that have been called Patt 102 at different times these are the later version for sure. I still think that this might have not been a Strand designed item but either bought in or licensed, it looks very like Arri or possibly Mole Richardson, the stand shown on that catalogue page is definitely Mole Richardson.
  11. Not sure, I don't know where it fits in the timeline. Looks vaguely reminiscent of some ARRI lanterns, but is definitely marked as Strand. Could be something built under licence perhaps. No idea really!
  12. Quite different, the one I am asking about looks like a cast body, this Kliegel is not.
  13. I recently saw some old Strand lights on eBay although they were removed from sale very quickly. I thought I knew the older Strand lights reasonably well, but I din't recognise these and can't find them in the Strand Archive. Anyone know what they are? Image 01 Image 02
  14. They look nice!What power are they and how do they compare with original lamp? And I may be looking for some original holders The LED fittings are from the BLOB range by Mr Resistor. Frankly I can't remember exactly which variant I used as it was supplied by the customer. They were fitted tight to the back of the lens, using the original 3 fixing points with larger washers. The L shaped bit of aluminium was to support the transformer. You couldn't really use them as a stage light. They were purely decorative, and gave usable light in an office environment, but certainly not up to stage use.
  15. I should have all these bits as I removed them from a batch of 123s I fitted LEDs into for an interior design project a few years ago. They will be in a "safe place" in one of three workshops so may take a while to find. Here are some pictures of both the original reflector and the LED conversion which does away with it.
  16. Vista was bought by Chroma-Q from Jands a couple of years ago.
  17. Back in the 80's I worked occasionally at the Donmar shop in Shorts Gardens, and Donmar Hire. Anything from hire going to an Alberry theatre FOH had to be painted gold. There was a story that a previous tech on being told to spray some 264's gold had forgotten to mask or remove the lenses... This wasn't noticed until rigged apparently, when even less than usual light came out the end!
  18. Hi Leigh, give me a shout on mike@cmeventservices.co.uk, might have a Patt 23 handle, definately some stands, and maybe some other bits you might be interested in.
  19. I have a few assorted period stands in the "projects to be completed one day - honest" pile... I've messaged you.
  20. Oops, you are correct, it's described as a stepped prismatic lens, not a fresnel! The shutters should have been a giveaway too. Next time I'll look at the data sheets and not rely on memory :-)
  21. Ah yes, forgot about that, we used to hang a few hook clamps on the handle as a counterbalance :-)
  22. This is what I recall being an 823. Well, the long straight front body, at least. The Strand Archive has an entry for such too. 823 is a fresnel I think initially 23N was an alternative lens tube to the normal short one. At some point, the same casting as the 823, with a PC lens and a handle became the Patt 23N MkII.
  23. Yes, usually seen with an N lens to make a basic followspot. I think I have a handle in my box of Patt bits.
  24. There are 3 variants of Patt 23 that use the standard lens tube which has two lens positions: Patt 23 uses a 3 1/2" x 5" lens in the front, and a spill ring at the back. Patt 23W uses a 3 1/2" x 5" lens in the front, and another 3 1/2" x 5" lens at the back. Patt 23F uses a 3 1/2" x 4" Fresnel lens at the front, and a spill ring at the back. I used to work occasionally for an LD that had a box of spre lenses, it wasn't uncommon to have to add the second lens into the lens tube at the top of a Tallescope to gain a little extra spread! I can't think of a common fresnel with a 3 1/2" lens, minuette and acclaim are both 4 1/2" I think, and they are the smallest generlly avilable.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.