LXbydesign Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 Ive had a look through the manual but couldnt see any info . . Is it possible and if so how can you have a chase within a cue stack. Ie Cue 1 .... Lights Up Cue 2 .... Add center special Cue 3 .... chase back pars cue 4 ... stop chase pars - fade to full. Ive only got as far as being able to turn cues into a chase and looping them. But then how would you stop that chase running and be able to bang onto the next static cue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smalljoshua Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 Can you set a Cue Stack Macro in Q3 to activate a chase on another playback then in Q4 to release it? Josh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shez Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 Josh's suggestion is the way I've done it before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CraigG Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 For having a chase within a stack, there's two ways really. Best way I've found is to use macros to activate and stop the chase stored on another PB or stack. Also, under the cue stack options under "Buttons" is a "Go jumps out of loop" which you can use to come out of that loop and back into a static cue, however I've often found this a bit awkward. Another option is if you're just chasing pars, maybe just use the FX engine such as a dim chase on a group of your back pars to make the effect and keep that within a single cue as normal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LXbydesign Posted May 6, 2014 Author Share Posted May 6, 2014 Ah ok. All of that makes sense. I thought more than likely re the macro option. The fx gen idea is good, but the chases would really be for mover stuff - for example bumping from one colour to the next (ditto beamshape) so I dont think the fx gen would cater for that. I'll have a crack with the macro idea. Thanks chaps :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark_s Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 Ah ok. All of that makes sense. I thought more than likely re the macro option. The fx gen idea is good, but the chases would really be for mover stuff - for example bumping from one colour to the next (ditto beamshape) so I dont think the fx gen would cater for that. I'll have a crack with the macro idea. Thanks chaps :-) The macro option is the best way forward, but you can have a chase within a cue stack. As Craig pointed out, set the 'GO jumps out of loop' cue stack option to yes, and change the individual cue type of the chase cues to chase in the cue stack. Voila - chase-within-stack. The FX engine in the latest build will also happily do that; use a 'colour flick' (think that's what it's called?) effect and specify the colour you want via a colour palette. To be honest, I'd probably go with the effects engine over using a chase, unless you want really fine control of what happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norty303 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 You could always create the chase and then create as FX option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LXbydesign Posted May 6, 2014 Author Share Posted May 6, 2014 Ah ok. All of that makes sense. I thought more than likely re the macro option. The fx gen idea is good, but the chases would really be for mover stuff - for example bumping from one colour to the next (ditto beamshape) so I dont think the fx gen would cater for that. I'll have a crack with the macro idea. Thanks chaps :-) The macro option is the best way forward, but you can have a chase within a cue stack. As Craig pointed out, set the 'GO jumps out of loop' cue stack option to yes, and change the individual cue type of the chase cues to chase in the cue stack. Voila - chase-within-stack. The FX engine in the latest build will also happily do that; use a 'colour flick' (think that's what it's called?) effect and specify the colour you want via a colour palette. To be honest, I'd probably go with the effects engine over using a chase, unless you want really fine control of what happens. Im just using scans, Mark - as opposed to a cmy colour picker. Also - because Im using 2 different makes of scan, the 'red ' and 'blue' arnt in the same slots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indyld Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 .... Although presumably your Red palette is red in everything? Another cue stack fired by macro is my favoured way of doing a chase in the middle of a list. It's easier to repeat several times in the stack, easier to edit and swap out / change significantly during production. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 I'd agree with Rob - rather than building your resource right into the cue stack you are just using it as to reference an external separate event - ie the chase - which can then be simply modified in its own right if need be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LXbydesign Posted May 7, 2014 Author Share Posted May 7, 2014 .... Although presumably your Red palette is red in everything? Another cue stack fired by macro is my favoured way of doing a chase in the middle of a list. It's easier to repeat several times in the stack, easier to edit and swap out / change significantly during production. yes Indy ! Your right about the palette. Only that on the fixture the red and blue are not next to each other on the wheel! Theres no real way to do it short of swapping around the colour tiles or replacing with cmy units . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ceecrb1 Posted May 7, 2014 Share Posted May 7, 2014 I also preffer the cuestack macro option for this case. I have a touring show where the opening has a very specific chase that cannot be done by FX.. I actually created individual cues for the final stack in say w3 or w4 playbacks in individual playbacks and in order. Then to start the show I just "go" an "empty" playback which does nothing other than activate w3-1 to w3-2 to w3-3 etc etc (while also de-activating cues which are finnished with).Rember to add a final "go" to deactivate the final cue if you need to release control for busking or any other playback! Releasing the playback which has the macro in will not actually release the final playback that is running!! I found this way clearer to work with for any updates or bugfixing later.. I could just check item by item along the line.It was also clearer for any other techs who may need to opp on days I might not be available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.