Solstace Posted April 16, 2013 Share Posted April 16, 2013 [dons flame-retardent suit] I'm looking for real-world views on a couple of new(ish) floor monitors that seem to have appeared recently on the market: Bose 310M - Tech document hereBose 620M - Tech document here What I'm trying to work out is - if I have £500 to spend on a brand spanking new stage wedge, are there any compelling features that actually make either of these Bose units worthwhile? Let's assume my singers need some reasonably compact passive monitors: My gut instinct is to try and find a co-ax/dual-concentric model, likely either 10" or 12" for mid-bass driver. I'd be aiming at fairly even (or at least predictable) response without many lobes/nodes in the HF within something like 70-100 degrees of axis. I'd expect sensitivity of around 95-100dB, peak SPL's of 120-130dB. On the surface, some key advantages of the Bose products for my intended use might be...We don't have much stage depth to play with, so the option of having a wide-dispersion horizontal spread, with controlled vertical dispersion is intriguing - in our building I think it might reduce "late" reflections around the building from stage monitors - I'd expect any increased horizontal spill will either be absorbed or arrive close enough to house signal so as not to interfere.Flexible in reasonably obvious ways - can be used to provide "deep" coverage for a single person, or "wide" coverage for multiple people.Seems not to need active EQ to correct, unlike 802 and other Panarray designs.On-axis response looks surprisingly good.Seemingly more compact than similar-spec boxes BUT, key problems for my use might be...Vertical plots look pretty ropey - lots of HF lobes, more than I think I'd expect of a more conventional wedge, so feedback and coverage may be unpredictable. Not something I'd like in a floor-monitor - the d&b MAX12 seems to be Plotted on-axis response seems to have been measured with undocumented "recommended" active EQ. Also seems somewhat "top-heavy" for use with many condensor-based handhelds, whose HF rear rejection I find can leave a lot to be desired...Max SPL (111dB for 310M, 113dB for 620M) doesn't seem all that high at 1m for either box - but then I am more used to d&b Max wedges capable of more like 130-ish dB @1m depending on amp config. The similarly-priced EV TX1152FM quotes (calculated) max SPL of 133dB, which is more in line with what I'd expect of a larger floor monitor.Sensitivity seems more "hifi" box than a professional box - 91dB (310M) and 90dB (620M), compared with more like 100dB for aforementioned similarly-priced EV 15" monitor.I wonder how long the grilles will last... Guess I'm curious as to how well these things *really* work in comparison to the competition. At present, despite some promising surface details, I can't think they'll actually be any better in real use than the RAMSA 4.5" stand-mounted boxes they'd be replacing except perhaps in terms of bass extension... So: Has anyone here actually put these through their paces in real gigs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Lewis Posted April 16, 2013 Share Posted April 16, 2013 Thanks for highlighting them - it looks to be an interesting box... I think you have already identified most of the probable issues. Can you get to listen to them? No doubt you will have to find a friendly authorised Bose distributor to do this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.