Frag_Me Posted March 4, 2007 Posted March 4, 2007 Hello chaps, Having never had the chance to use gauze before (Only in second year of A-Level Drama + Theatre Studies) I've come across a bit of a problem with an exam piece which I am covering lighting for. My design calls for two separate stage areas, one front, one rear, the divide through which the audience can see at times I require. As far as I am aware, a type of Gauze is necessary for this sort of effect. Linky Would the above gauze provide this type of effect if properly lit? I understand that as long as a blackout is maintained on the side I don't want to see then only the other side is visible (to a point, obviously). I've looked at other more expensive gauzes but as this is only a college project I'm on a limited budget. I posted this thread in this folder due to the amount of cyc talk that goes on, but apologies if it should be elsewhere. Cheers, Leo.
Ynot Posted March 4, 2007 Posted March 4, 2007 Leo One of the most common gauzes in use for stage is the sharks-tooth gauze, though by no means the only one. The basic tenet for all gauzes is the same, however - in that front and/or top lit they become opaque, and either reflect what light is shone at it or the picture that's painted on it. Back lit with NO front light they become semi-transparent, and thus you can see action/set behind the gauze. The differences between the types of gauze, as I see it, is what sort of lighting direction works best with them. Most of my gauze work has mainly been with basic sharks-tooth, but I've always found it works fine, though often a little play with the lights you have will be necessary.
w/robe Posted March 5, 2007 Posted March 5, 2007 I assume you know that the gauze will never be completely solid of completely transparant and the smaller your theatre the harder it is to do either effectively.
Suzette Posted March 5, 2007 Posted March 5, 2007 Remember when you are lighting the upstage area keep all light off the gauze from the back - ideally keep the actors about 2' away from the gauze and light them appropriately in that area. Light hitting the back of the gauze will make it more difficult to see through....
Frag_Me Posted March 5, 2007 Author Posted March 5, 2007 Thanks for the tips folks, unfortunately the stage area is fairly small but I'm hoping that using lots of barn doors and suchlike should shield the gauze appropriately.
Ynot Posted March 5, 2007 Posted March 5, 2007 Thanks for the tips folks, unfortunately the stage area is fairly small but I'm hoping that using lots of barn doors and suchlike should shield the gauze appropriately.You're not actually trying to shield the gauze when lighting from the front - only when lighting the scene from behind.
Frag_Me Posted March 5, 2007 Author Posted March 5, 2007 Ok, I see what you mean - when lighting from the front light as normal, when lighting the back avoid spill onto the gauze and no light at the front. If I were to light the front and rear simultaneously with no spill onto the gauze what do you think would happen?
Ynot Posted March 5, 2007 Posted March 5, 2007 Ok, I see what you mean - when lighting from the front light as normal, when lighting the back avoid spill onto the gauze and no light at the front. If I were to light the front and rear simultaneously with no spill onto the gauze what do you think would happen?You'd have confusion.You'd see a faded picture (if there's one painted on the gauze) and a shade of whatever's behind. Plus you'd see shadowy movement if bodies are behind the gauze.
Suzette Posted March 6, 2007 Posted March 6, 2007 Although if you had very tight lighting downstage - off the gauze (maybe just a tight profile coming in from the side) and the same upstage with absolutely nothing hitting the gauze you MAY get away with it. Unfortunately as you say the stage is quite small then will have a few more problems than someone trying to do the same thing on a larger stage. I think that you might just need to experiment .......
Frag_Me Posted March 27, 2007 Author Posted March 27, 2007 Link Just to verify: If I were to order 2m of this item, would I receive a piece 2m by 5.01m or am I interpreting that wrong?
paulears Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 yep, that is how I'd interpret it - the roll is 5m wide and it's sold by the mtr. dont forget that if you by it like this, you'll need to sow on tapes at the top to hang it, and you need a little extra depth as you have to hem the bottom and put something heavy in it to strech it - otherwise the creases wreck the effect. Typically metal conduit is used, (as in the surface mounted steel stuff that electricians use to carry out surface wiring in industrial buildings) is used - with couplers to allow you to store it properly. Alternatively, a bit of chain will do, but isn't quite so good on a gauze, as it can bend
Just Some Bloke Posted March 28, 2007 Posted March 28, 2007 If I were to light the front and rear simultaneously with no spill onto the gauze what do you think would happen? As long as there's no spill at all on the gauze from either side that can certainly be made to work so you'd see both. Obviously, the front will be most obvious but if, for instance, you had some steeldeck behind the gauze to raise the cast up that can work rather well. It's an effect I used a few years ago for Children of Eden, for instance, in which God appeared behind the gauze and raised up on deck. He could be seen on his own or with the rest of the cast and could appear and disappear at will.
Frag_Me Posted March 28, 2007 Author Posted March 28, 2007 Super, it'll all be the in the experimentation I suppose! I'm buying in my materials this week - the idea is to have a "screen" on the backdrop flat of my set through which the actors can be seen at certain points, and at one point be seen to be looking in. The time when both of these are likely to be needed at once is when the main stage area is at a low level anyway so this shouldn't cause too many problems. As always, I'll let you know how it goes! Performance is on May 10th.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.