musht Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 http://petapixel.com/2015/02/09/coelux-artificial-sunlight-thats-good-enough-fool-cameras-brain/ 61 grand plus fitting , box is a meter deep. Patent is less than illuminating http://www.google.com/patents/US8469550 But a bit of searching on nano particles, apart from treatment for sweaty socks , brings up this application: http://newsoffice.mit.edu/2014/seeing-things-a-new-transparent-display-system-could-provide-heads-up-data-0121 That possibly explains the blue colour of the aperture but how are the glowing sun and sharp shadows acheived? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
themadhippy Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 if its 100% the same as sunlight I can see it being a big hit with indoor gardners Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiLL Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 indoor gardeners eh? Well they'll be the only ones who could afford one that's for sure, although they may prefer to install it themselves ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jivemaster Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 My local hospital has "sky images" in the light fittings, there are lots of rooms with no natural light and just a transparency of blue sky and clouds does sometimes amuse, I guess it cost say £25 per fitting though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sleah Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 I love how some of the nay-sayers clearly have never seen or even understand buildings that have more than one floor or are underground when they say "just fit a darn skylight" :** laughs out loud **: Not to mention the poor souls who fail to realise that sunlight is more than just visible light.... ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.