Jump to content

abbotsmike

Regular Members
  • Posts

    411
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by abbotsmike

    • Give up worrying about latency - your staff at home don't (shouldn't!) care if the video they are seeing is delayed by 30s from real life. Once you enable low-latency mode on streaming stuff you're telling everything that you're less worried about a stable/reliable stream than you are about getting it to your audience as quickly as possible.
    • Use OBS rather than the web browser streaming options - they're designed for quickly throwing something together and for mobile phone pop-up streams - not 24/hour continuous feeds.

     

    Interestingly, the low and ultra low latency options used to only be available within the browser, not as an rtmp stream. I assume it was doing a webrtc session or similar.

  1. What does the youtube stream health page say?

     

    Nothing wrong with the setup you're using per se, but the low latency and ultra low latency options on youtube used to only be available on "webcam" mode. They are inherently less stable!

     

    Would it be an option to set up a zoom call or google meets call, and have people able to join that instead?

     

     

     

    The stream health is consistently on Excellent. 'Broadcasting' it has never really had any problems, it just seems to be at the receiving end. Fine and dandy on mobile devices, but desktops/laptops just can't cope for some reason regardless of what network they're connected to (Office or personal or even 4G)

     

    I'd play with dropping the bitrate, changing the resolution and checking that the people watching are watching at the same res you're streaming at. With the lower latency options it's having to transcode a copy for each different view bitrate and resolution. It might just be that youtube allocates more server capacity to maiing it seamless on mobile than desktop or something similar, especially for small, private streams.

  2. What does the youtube stream health page say?

     

    Nothing wrong with the setup you're using per se, but the low latency and ultra low latency options on youtube used to only be available on "webcam" mode. They are inherently less stable!

     

    Would it be an option to set up a zoom call or google meets call, and have people able to join that instead?

  3. RG6 is more of a size class than a specific performance spec, but each of the major manufacturers have an RG6 class cable.

     

    Proper labelling and quality termination is hugely important. 9 out of ten times, when I rig a venue, it's easier to pull our own in that deal with and troubleshoot the unknown installed stuff, even if it runs to and from the perfect spots!

    If you can, pull some Single Mode fibre in. The cable and the termination is cheap, the kit on the ends is more expensive, but you do gain future proofing. Getting 4k long distances over coax is a real pain.

     

    Network infrastructure thought about too?

  4. Having used vmix and cheap capture devices extensively, they often drop frames left right and centre, and sometimes just give up entirely until you reboot them.

     

    Then the poor laptop running it all overheats, and someone wonders why their livestream went down.

     

    Lots of solutions for lots of budgets, but there's usually a reason that cheap stuff is cheap! (I use blackmagic extensively also)

  5. It's much easier to get a ~0.125MHz channel to cut through the noise in a less crowded bit of spectrum, than it is a 20 or 40MHz wide channel in very crowded spectrum.

     

    I have used teradek extensively, I wouldn't choose to rely on them, or anything unlicensed, for any show critical application.

  6. E2A: I presume that the large number of personal mics still being used in news & magazine programmes are now fitted, under instruction, by the wearer, not the crew.

     

    That has become standard procedure yes.

  7. I'd probably go down the line of iem TX and rack mount radio mic Rx with suitable paddles, personally. We're fortunate enough to have the kit around to do it though, along with some decent antenna options!

     

    Made for the job stuff is xirium, and expensive. I don't know what range sennheiser quote for their radio mic receiver based wireless PA....

     

    Next time I'm at the office and bored I might have a play.

  8. I don't. That was rather the point.

    Whilst laptop headphone outputs are often expected to be pretty poor quality, in the larger scheme of things, they usually get the job done just fine.

     

    I totally agree, unless it was my previous laptop that wouldn't play nicely with anything one the PSU was connected. It wasn't just a ground loop either, the audio output became almost intolerably noisy.

  9. Given the ATEM doesn't seem to have a Preview out, and you'll be wanted to cue the Blu-Ray maybe before switching to it - could the splitter be sold as a way to get a local HDMI preview (just a cheap monitor) and also strip the HDCP for the ATEM - it's a more complicated setup but sold that way it doesn't have an extra box just for illicit legal reasons.

     

    This is the main reason I don't own one already. One HDMI out that (I think) does Program, or Preview, or Multiview. In almost every environment I'm working in I'd want at least 2 of those things at the same time!

  10. I've had 24 days of corporate work over the next 7 weeks cancel in the last couple of days. The virus won't kill me, running out of money might ?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.