QUOTE (Nick512 @ 9 Mar 2010, 11:28 AM)

I am still shocked by some of the responses I got… and would never hire anyone with the you get what you pay for attitude!
In which case it may be you who’s losing out, by cutting yourself off from some of the best crew you’ll never get to meet - all for the sake of a few quid. Pity.
QUOTE (w/robe @ 10 Mar 2010, 12:44 PM)

QUOTE (Nick512 @ 9 Mar 2010, 6:12 PM)

I think you need to re-read my original posts. at no time did I need free crew,
You may not have said it but it was the impression I got from your post
That’s the impression I got, too. I think it was the bit that said…
QUOTE (Nick512 @ 9 Mar 2010, 11:28 AM)

…we would put a small team of very experienced crew into key positions and have enough volunteers from the industry to be able to run the show but then to flesh it out with students ...
…which created it for me.
That said, I’m glad to hear you got the crew you needed, Nick. I’m glad that they felt some benefit from the exercise and that it will result in some paid work for them in the near future.
You might be surprised to read that I actually do have some respect for what you’re trying to do and would like to see it continue. It’s just that I think the model you’re using is flawed, always was and is wholly inappropriate for our times. I hope that what I’m about to say will encourage you to see things a little differently.
I still believe that unpaid gigs actually take opportunity
away from people, especially those who have the least of it - people from poorer backgrounds, who can't afford to work for free - and that jobs like this prevent opportunities from being awarded on merit - to those who genuinely show the most promise.
Not everyone comes from a nice, comfy, middle class background and has the Bank of Mummy and Daddy to fund their early career moves.
I think it’s utterly wrong to equate the ability to work for free with the “right attitude” and that this in itself, is a very negative attitude, which may be deeply hurtful to those who are disadvantaged by it.
Why should it fall to those at the bottom of the ladder and need the most support, to invest in the future? Shouldn’t the industry put it’s hands in its pockets and take a financially more proactive stance in creating of the kind of skilled workforce it needs, in order to advance live ents through the 21st Century?
I’m fed up with the idea that you have to live on the edge of poverty, to be true to your craft; that you should have to prove yourself through suffering and fall over backwards with gratitude, anytime someone asks you to work on their show. I argue that we need more people with the self-confidence to place a material value on what they produce for a living, and fewer unambitious self-haters, who see showbusiness as a way to cocoon themselves from the slings and arrows of the Real World, so they can float along in their own little luvvie reality bubble, which they expect everyone else to pay for.
Yes, things have changed - certainly since I was at college, almost thirty years ago. For one thing, students don’t get grants to spend any more, they get loans which have to be repaid. Each and every graduate in the UK starts their working life with a five figure debt to pay off. Some of them find that their shiny new degree doesn’t automatically qualify them for the work the want to do and that further study is required - at considerable, additional expense.
There have also been calls from management over the last 8-10 years, for crew to be more businesslike in their approach to work and stop treating the whole thing like a game. This is something I’m all for; but the reverse side of the coin, is that people are going to expect to be at least recompensed, if not actually rewarded for their labours - and why shouldn’t they be?
As I’ve said before: I fully agree, that you can’t expect to earn top dollar when you’re still a student or fresh out of college, but I don’t see why you shouldn’t be paid the National Minimum Wage, especially as it’s been shown by BECTU, to be a legal requirement - one which you, Nick, appear to have ignored, by co-opting these people onto your production - no matter how noble your intentions were.
And if it turns out that they
were illegally employed, can you
really be sure that they would have been covered by your insurance, had the unthinkable happened?
Like I said: I admire what you’re doing up to a point; but I think you need to take a look at the way you’re doing it.
€0.02