QUOTE (Gareth Owen @ 1 Jul 2009, 10:33 PM)

Am I right in thinking some systems have limiters in the recievers, some in the transmitters? I have an idea that Trantec S5000 IEMs have the limiter in the TX but that the Shure PSM700 stuff has the limiter in the receiver?
All IEMs (and radio mics) should incorporate a peak deviation limiter to ensure that the transmission stays within channel limits, I'm sure this is the case with all reputable brands. On its own that probably isn't something you would want to rely on to protect your ears. Plus any limiter at the transmitter will not protect you from peaks of noise that did not originate from the input to that transmitter. The level of noise that you can get through your moulds if the squelch opens on a blank frequency is going to be very loud; e.g. if the TX gets powered down whilst you are doing your walk around listening to the noise floor with the pack at max volume trying to find that elusive dead spot that the singer keeps complaining about.... So to be effective in all circumstances you really do need the volume limiter to be at the RX end.
All Sennheiser IEM's have incorporated some form of switchable volume limiter on the receiver pack. On the original 3000 series and Evolution 'G1' it simply took the form of an attenuator which 'limited' the maximum possible volume you could get out of the receiver without any dynamics element to it. Crude yes, but it did get around any arguments about the ballistics of the limiter affecting the sound! On Evolution 300 IEM G2 and all other models since there is a more conventional, proper, switchable, limiter in the receivers which is
in by default on the factory preset. Guess what's the first thing most monitor engineers do / ask for when you give them the packs.... 'can you make sure all the limiters are off'.
Canford audio do in line volume limiters for headphones. Presumably they could be used on IEM moulds given the impedance and sensititvity figures to calculate a limit value from.