QUOTE (Dan Appleby @ 19 Nov 2006, 10:49 PM)

QUOTE (Pastie Kid @ 17 Nov 2006, 11:25 PM)

2x21" drivers, serious beef!!
eeeeuuurrrghhhhh the good old 21"-ers. Hit the kick drum... half a second later you hear it (or should that be feel it?).
Like I say, I'll reserve judgement on the aspect rig until I hear it furryface - I use d&b on a regular basis (regarded as some of the best systems around), which use d&b amps with bespoke dsp for each individual box - the vocal clarity of all their gear is among the best I've ever heard. The d&b Q7 also uses 10" drivers for the vocal range :-) I think it would be interesting to hear a comparison.
Reeling of a list of impressive sounding features of a box means nothing! What's the aspects control of dispersion like? is it as good off axis as on?
Just spent the last hour writing a considered and thoughtful response to your mail which has just disappeared due to lack of sleep and caffeine.

Haven't got the energy to think it all through again. You have some points. So do I. I am basing mine on my experience (18years) and I'm sure you are basing your points on yours. Fair enough.
Q7 and Aspect are totally different systems in terms of philosphy, design, useage and market. The nearest D&B equivalent would be the J series in terms of ueage and market but it is still very distant in term sof philosophy and design. All manufacturers have differing philosphies on achieving an optimum audio performance but all systems are compromised by price-point, market, manufacturing technology. As such each manufacturer picks their own areas of compromise and excellence. The more systems you have experience of the more you begin to realise this.
I would also put forward the arguement that many of the "advances" in Audio Production technology in recent years have compromised audio quality and performance in favour of consistency and ease of use. This is not just related to this particular point you raise but the recent changes available in the technology of sound reinforcement such as dsp, control surfaces, amplifiers, signal transmission and speaker design have not always lead to a improvement of the sound of events. Safer and more consistent, yes. Amazing and compelling, rarely.
But in short Aspect has real dispersion from 20kHz down to around 1kHz (where size of horn comes into play) rather than the more often quoted "nominal" or "pickwhatlooksbestforyourproduct" dispersion quoted by many manufacturers. Good pattern control and off axis drop off. Allowing a point source system to arrayed with next to none of the usual problems associated with multiple sources. I did go into this in much more detail in my lost message but if you would like to discuss the various issues concerning Aspect please PM me and I'll reply when I've had some sleep.
In short both our opinions are valid, like manufacturers approaches to the same problem. I hope that, if you move further into the murky audio world, using different systems in different circumstances and somehow manage to scratch a living from it (like me

) that you take each experience as it comes learn the good and bad points, take conclusions based on experience and keep your mind open to new possibilities. The truth is out there but no-one has managed to manufacture it yet.
Right, some form of rest is called for, getting too old for these late nights/early mornings lark.
F